Let me put it mathematically, as per the theory of Sets. here we go..
Consider A as Mumbai.
Consider B as Maharashtra.
Consider C as India.
Statement # 1: A is a subset of B, denoted A ⊆ B
Statement # 2: B is a subset of C, denoted B ⊆ C
Hence we can make a Statement # 3: A is a subset of C, denoted A ⊆ C
But the point I am trying to make is that Statement # 3 is false if Statement 1 doesn't exist....as simple as that...So if one has to weaken Statement # 1, then the Indian constitution needs to be amended..i.e. there should be no division of India at all...there has to be no single State or Union territory in India- which, I think, is quite impossible. Then why there is war of words....why are we fighting against each other....why not simply accept Statement # 1 and close this issue once and for all?
The issue is actually very simple to which many do not think it as simple as I think. The issue is actually about the two idealogies in the larger picture...the ideology supporting MUMBAI(belonging to Maharashtra) versus the ideology supporting BOMBAY(belonging to India).
I understand that this is a very sensitive issue. However, I am likely to take a firm stand to support Marathi, Marathi people, Marathi language and will support all such elements strengthening Maharashtra's pride. There are lots of unanswered questions in my mind. One big question is that- Why is it that Mumbai belongs more to India than that to Maharashtra? (can we prove this as per Set theory?)...your thoughts please!